Let It Beep: A Petty Fight Between Apples

A symbol of freedom standing atop the United States Capitol seems like the perfect representation of American A computer sound effect sparked one of the funniest stories in tech history. This week, Michael explores the decades-long trademark war between Apple Computer and the Beatles’ Apple Corps, a conflict that stretched from the late 1970s into the age of the iPod and iTunes. Along the way, an Apple engineer slipped a sarcastic message into the Macintosh operating system, creating the legendary “Sosumi” alert sound. What started as a legal battle ended with one of the greatest corporate inside jokes ever shipped to millions of users. Then we play the Yap Yap Quiz with Mindreader Eric Dittelman!

Did you know The Internet Says It’s True is now a book? Get it here: https://amzn.to/4miqLNy

Technology companies have always had a strange relationship with humor. On one hand, they’re often built by engineers who delight in inside jokes, hidden messages, and little surprises buried deep inside products. On the other hand, these are massive corporations run by lawyers, investors, and executives whose job is to avoid risk. Those two forces tend to collide in fascinating ways. Sometimes the engineers win, and sometimes the lawyers win, but occasionally the engineers manage to sneak something past everyone.

The history of computing is filled with these little acts of rebellion. Software developers have hidden their names inside video games, even when management told them not to. Engineers have tucked secret messages onto circuit boards that wouldn’t be discovered until years later. Entire teams have spent months building hidden Easter eggs into products simply because they thought it would be funny. In a world built on logic and precision, there’s often a surprising amount of mischief.

One famous example came from the early days of personal computing when programmers would leave signatures buried inside software code like digital graffiti artists. Another came from hardware designers who etched tiny cartoons onto computer chips that would only become visible under magnification. Most users never knew these things existed. The engineers knew, though, and sometimes that was enough.

But every now and then, one of these inside jokes escaped into the public eye. When that happened, the joke often became bigger than the product itself. The story we’re talking about today involves a sound effect, a trademark dispute, a Beatle, a computer company, and one of the most sarcastic filenames ever shipped in a commercial product.

To understand how we got there, we need to go back before Apple was one of the most valuable companies in the world. We need to go back to a time when personal computers were still finding their identity and when the music industry was dealing with a new kind of threat.

The late 1970s and early 1980s were a period of explosive growth in personal computing. Companies were appearing everywhere, each hoping to become the standard for this new industry. Among them was a young company called Apple Computer, founded by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne in 1976. Apple’s success with the Apple II helped establish it as a major player in the growing market.

At the same time, another company already existed with a name that carried enormous cultural weight. That company was Apple Corps, the multimedia company founded by the members of the Beatles in 1968. The name came from the Beatles’ business empire, and by the late 1970s it was closely associated with one of the most famous bands in history.

The problem should already be obvious.

There were now two companies named Apple operating in fields that were beginning to overlap. One was a computer company. The other was tied to music and entertainment. That might not seem like a huge issue today, but trademark law exists largely to prevent consumer confusion. If two companies operate in related industries using the same name, lawyers tend to get very interested.

Apple Corps certainly did.

In 1978, Apple Corps sued Apple Computer for trademark infringement. The concern was that consumers might believe the computer company was somehow associated with the Beatles’ organization. The dispute eventually ended in a settlement in 1981. According to reporting from multiple contemporary sources, Apple Computer agreed to pay Apple Corps a settlement and acknowledged certain limitations involving the music business.

At the time, this arrangement probably seemed manageable. Computers were computers. Music companies were music companies. The industries appeared distinct enough that both sides could coexist.

The problem was that technology doesn’t stay in its lane.

As computers became more sophisticated, they began handling sound. What started as simple beeps evolved into increasingly capable audio functions. Suddenly, machines that had once been glorified calculators were capable of generating music and manipulating audio. The line separating the two industries was becoming blurry.

That brought the lawyers back.

In 1989, Apple Corps filed another lawsuit against Apple Computer. This time the dispute centered on Apple’s growing involvement with audio technology. One of the key issues involved the Macintosh’s ability to produce and work with sounds. Apple Corps argued that Apple Computer was moving into territory reserved for the music business.

This sounds almost quaint today. We live in a world where a phone can function as a recording studio, a jukebox, a movie theater, and a publishing platform all at once. But in the late 1980s, these categories still mattered. Companies and courts were trying to figure out where one industry ended and another began.

The dispute eventually led to another settlement in 1991. Reports indicate that Apple Computer paid approximately $26.5 million as part of the agreement. More importantly, the settlement attempted to draw a clearer line between the activities of the two companies. Apple Computer would generally stay on the technology side of things, while Apple Corps retained rights associated with creative musical content.

Of course, anyone familiar with Steve Jobs can probably guess how long that neat division remained useful.

The funny thing about Steve Jobs is that he often seemed incapable of accepting artificial boundaries. If someone said a computer couldn’t do something, Jobs tended to view that as a challenge rather than a rule. Apple’s entire history is filled with examples of the company expanding into areas where conventional wisdom suggested it didn’t belong.

Meanwhile, inside Apple, engineers continued building products that pushed deeper into multimedia. Sound was becoming an increasingly important part of the Macintosh experience. Startup chimes, alerts, notifications, and user interface sounds were all evolving as computers became more consumer-friendly.

One of the people involved in shaping those sounds was Jim Reekes.

Reekes joined Apple and worked on sound design during an era when the Macintosh was developing a more sophisticated audio identity. He would later become known for several iconic Macintosh sounds, including the startup chime used on many Apple computers. But his most famous contribution would emerge from a trademark battle that had been dragging on for years.

To appreciate what happened next, it’s important to understand the mood inside Apple at the time. By many accounts, employees were frustrated with the continuing legal disputes. From their perspective, they were building computers. They weren’t running a record label. The ongoing arguments over what constituted music versus technology could sometimes feel absurd.

Jim Reekes felt that frustration particularly strongly.

Years later, Reekes recounted the story in interviews and public appearances. According to his own account, Apple engineers needed a name for a new system sound that would appear in the Macintosh operating system. Under normal circumstances, this should have been a trivial task. You create a sound effect, give it a descriptive filename, and move on with your day.

Except nothing involving sound was trivial anymore.

Because of the ongoing legal sensitivity surrounding music, Apple employees had reportedly become cautious about how sounds were named. Reekes later explained that previous sound names had sometimes been scrutinized because they carried musical references. In his telling, this atmosphere had become irritating.

So when it came time to name a new alert sound, he decided to make a statement.

The sound itself was a short chime used as a system alert. It wasn’t a song. It wasn’t a musical composition. It was simply one of the various notification sounds users could select for their Macintosh computers.

Reekes initially wanted to name it something much more direct.

According to his later recollections, the original filename he submitted was “Let It Beep.” The joke was obvious. It was a playful reference to the Beatles’ famous song “Let It Be.” It was also exactly the sort of thing that would attract unwanted attention from lawyers already engaged in a long-running dispute involving the Beatles’ company.

Predictably, the name was rejected.

That could have been the end of the story. A manager says no, a new name gets chosen, and everyone moves on. But Reekes wasn’t quite finished.

Instead, he submitted a new name.

The replacement filename was “Sosumi.”

At first glance, it looks like a vaguely Japanese-sounding word. It doesn’t immediately raise any red flags. It doesn’t reference music. It doesn’t reference the Beatles. It appears harmless.

Which was exactly the point.

Because when you say it out loud, “Sosumi” sounds remarkably like the phrase “so sue me.”

When we return from a quick break, we’ll look at how a sarcastic filename managed to survive Apple’s approval process, how it became one of the most famous computer sound effects ever created, and how the battle between Apple Computer and the Beatles eventually exploded into the era of iTunes and digital music.

We’ll be right back.

<MIDROLL BREAK>

When we left off, Apple sound designer Jim Reekes had watched his proposed sound name “Let It Beep” get rejected. Rather than giving up, he submitted a replacement title that appeared innocent on paper but carried a message anyone could understand once it was spoken aloud. That message was “so sue me,” cleverly disguised as the filename “Sosumi.”

The remarkable part is that it worked.

According to Reekes’ later retellings of the story, the name made it through the approval process because it didn’t obviously reference music. It wasn’t the title of a Beatles song. It wasn’t a lyric. It wasn’t a musical term. To anyone reading the word on a form, it simply looked like an unusual name. The joke only became apparent when somebody pronounced it.

Even then, Reekes added another layer of protection. In interviews, he explained that if anyone questioned the meaning, he could simply claim it was a Japanese word. The truth was that it wasn’t Japanese at all. It was a piece of phonetic mischief designed to slip through a bureaucracy that had become hypersensitive to anything involving sound and music.

The sound debuted as part of Apple’s Macintosh operating system and quickly became one of the selectable alert sounds available to users. Most people who clicked through the system preferences had no idea they were looking at the result of a long-running trademark war. To them, it was simply another option among the various chirps, chimes, and electronic noises their computers could make.

That is often how inside jokes survive. The general public sees the surface while only a small group understands the context underneath. The joke exists on two levels at once. One audience hears a notification sound, while another hears an engineer rolling his eyes at years of legal wrangling.

What’s particularly fascinating is that the joke wasn’t hidden deep inside source code where nobody would ever find it. It was right there in the operating system. Anyone could see the name. The secret wasn’t its visibility. The secret was that most people lacked the context to understand why it was funny.

As the years passed, the story spread among Macintosh enthusiasts. Reekes eventually discussed it publicly, and the tale became one of the most beloved pieces of Apple folklore. It fit perfectly with the company’s reputation for employing brilliant people who occasionally expressed themselves through acts of playful rebellion.

The timing also made the story more interesting because the broader conflict between Apple Computer and Apple Corps was far from over. The two companies had settled disputes before, but technology was evolving faster than legal agreements could keep up.

By the mid-1990s and early 2000s, the world was changing in ways that neither side had fully anticipated when earlier settlements were signed. The internet was transforming how people consumed media. Digital audio files were becoming common. Portable music players were gaining popularity. Computers were no longer just tools for spreadsheets and word processing. They were becoming entertainment devices.

Then Steve Jobs returned to Apple.

Jobs had been forced out of the company in 1985 and spent years building other ventures, including the computer company NeXT and helping transform Pixar into an animation powerhouse. When he returned to Apple in 1997, the company was struggling. Over the next several years, he helped engineer one of the most remarkable corporate turnarounds in business history.

Part of that turnaround involved simplifying Apple’s product line and focusing on consumer experiences. Jobs understood something that many technology executives had missed. People didn’t buy technology because they loved technology. They bought technology because of what it allowed them to do.

Music became a central part of that vision.

In 2001, Apple introduced the iPod. Today it’s difficult to appreciate how revolutionary the device felt. Portable music players already existed, but the iPod combined hardware, software, and simplicity in a way that made digital music dramatically more accessible.

For Apple Corps, alarms immediately started ringing.

From their perspective, Apple Computer wasn’t merely producing computers anymore. It was selling products whose primary purpose involved music. The line that earlier agreements had attempted to draw was becoming harder and harder to see.

Then Apple launched the iTunes Music Store in 2003.

If the iPod nudged Apple toward the music business, iTunes practically sprinted across the line. The store allowed users to purchase and download songs directly through Apple’s platform. Apple wasn’t creating the music itself, but it was unquestionably involved in distributing and selling it.

Another lawsuit followed.

In 2003, Apple Corps sued Apple Computer again, arguing that the technology company had violated previous agreements by moving deeper into music-related activities. The legal battle that had begun in the 1970s entered a new chapter shaped by digital downloads and online commerce.

What’s interesting is how difficult the questions had become. Earlier disputes involved relatively straightforward distinctions. One company made computers. Another company managed musical properties. By the early 2000s, those categories were collapsing.

When you buy a song through software, are you engaging with a technology platform or a music company? When a device stores thousands of songs, is it primarily a computer or primarily a music player? The law was struggling to answer questions that technology had created almost overnight.

The dispute eventually reached the courts in the United Kingdom. In 2006, a judge ruled in favor of Apple Computer, concluding that the company’s use of the Apple trademark in connection with the iTunes Music Store did not violate the existing agreement between the companies. Apple Corps appealed, but the ruling largely stood.

That could have been another temporary pause in hostilities. Instead, something surprising happened.

The two companies finally decided to stop fighting.

In February 2007, Apple Inc. and Apple Corps announced a comprehensive trademark settlement. Under the agreement, Apple Inc. acquired ownership of all trademarks related to the Apple name and licensed certain rights back to Apple Corps. The arrangement effectively resolved decades of conflict.

After nearly thirty years of legal disputes, the war was over.

The timing was significant because another issue had long frustrated Beatles fans. Despite the band’s enormous popularity, Beatles music was notably absent from digital download services during much of the early online music era. Licensing complexities and business negotiations had kept the catalog unavailable in places where consumers increasingly expected to find it.

The settlement helped clear the path toward future cooperation.

Then, in 2010, something many observers had wondered about for years finally happened. The Beatles catalog became available on the iTunes Store. Apple, the technology company, was now selling music by the Beatles, the band behind Apple Corps.

It was difficult to imagine a more complete reversal of the situation that had produced the Sosumi joke years earlier.

What makes the story particularly satisfying is that nobody involved could have predicted where things would end. When Reekes named a sound effect “Sosumi,” the dispute still felt ongoing and unresolved. The joke carried the frustration of an engineer living in the middle of an active conflict. It wasn’t crafted with the benefit of hindsight.

That’s one reason the story continues to resonate. The joke feels authentic because it emerged from a real moment of irritation. It wasn’t created by a marketing department trying to appear clever. It was created by somebody who had reached the point where humor seemed like the best response.

There is another layer to the story that’s easy to overlook. Throughout the entire dispute, neither company was entirely wrong. Apple Corps had legitimate trademark concerns. The Beatles had built a valuable brand, and protecting it was part of their responsibility. At the same time, Apple Computer found itself operating in a world where technology naturally expanded into new forms of media.

The conflict wasn’t really about villains and heroes. It was about the difficulty of predicting the future.

Trademark agreements are often written with current realities in mind. The challenge comes when technology changes faster than language. Terms that seem clear in one decade become ambiguous in the next. Boundaries that appear obvious begin to disappear.

The Apple disputes offer a fascinating example of that phenomenon. Lawyers attempted to define where music ended and technology began. The problem was that digital technology was steadily eliminating the distinction.

Today, most people carry devices in their pockets that function as phones, cameras, computers, navigation systems, televisions, recording studios, gaming consoles, and music players simultaneously. Trying to separate those categories feels almost impossible. Yet that was precisely the challenge facing the courts and the companies involved.

Jim Reekes’ little joke survived because it captured the absurdity of the situation. Here were intelligent people spending years arguing about definitions while technology continued evolving around them. A filename that effectively translated to “so sue me” expressed a sentiment many people probably felt but couldn’t say publicly.

The sound itself remained part of Macintosh lore for years. Users who selected it often did so because they knew the backstory. It became more than a notification sound. It became a tiny artifact from one of the longest-running trademark disputes in modern business history.

There is something wonderfully human about that. We often think of corporate history in terms of court filings, settlement agreements, and executive decisions. Those things matter, but they’re only part of the story. Behind every lawsuit and every negotiation are people reacting to circumstances, making jokes, venting frustrations, and trying to navigate situations that don’t always make sense.

Sometimes those human moments become the most memorable part.

Ask a technology enthusiast about the Apple-Beatles trademark battles and you might get a summary of settlements, court rulings, and licensing agreements. Ask them about Sosumi and you’ll probably get a smile. The joke distilled decades of tension into a single word.

And perhaps that’s why the story has endured. The legal documents are important, but the sound effect is memorable. One represents the official history. The other represents the emotional reality experienced by people living through it.

In the end, the companies made peace. Apple Inc. became one of the most successful companies in history. The Beatles’ legacy remained secure. Digital music transformed the entertainment industry. The feared overlap that generated so much conflict became an ordinary part of everyday life.

Interestingly, the story didn’t end with the original filename. As Apple evolved its operating systems over the years, observant users noticed that “Sosumi” eventually appeared as “Sonumi” in some later versions of macOS. It wasn’t accompanied by a press release or an official explanation, and many users never noticed the change at all. But for Macintosh enthusiasts who knew the backstory, it felt a little like finding a favorite joke rewritten years later. The original “Sosumi” had become part of Apple folklore, a tiny act of rebellion preserved inside a computer, and no matter what later versions called it, most fans still remembered the alert sound by the name that sounded suspiciously like “So Sue Me.”

The moral of the story is that sometimes the funniest response to a complicated problem isn’t an argument or a lawsuit. Sometimes it’s a joke that survives long enough to outlast the conflict itself.

And that story sounds made up, but it’s true.

The Internet Says It’s True.

Review this podcast at https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-internet-says-it-s-true/id1530853589

Bonus episodes and content available at http://Patreon.com/MichaelKent

For special discounts and links to our sponsors, visit http://theinternetsaysitstrue.com/deals